# Weight-Loss Drugs in Hypertension: What the Cochrane Review Lacked | This GLP

A Cochrane review of long-term weight drugs in hypertension found the semaglutide and tirzepatide trials reported no mortality, cardiovascular or adverse event results.

Publisher: This GLP Editorial Team
Canonical: https://thisglp.com/research/eight-trials-and-nobody-counted-the-deaths
Updated: 2026-09-18
Published: 2026-09-17

[← Research](https://thisglp.com/research)

Evidence

# Weight-Loss Drugs in Hypertension: What the Cochrane Review Lacked

Eight trials, 13,000 people with high blood pressure. The semaglutide and tirzepatide trials reported none of the outcomes the review was built to assess.

[This GLP Editorial Team](https://thisglp.com/about)September 20266 min readUpdated September 2026

Did the trial report deaths, events and harms? · orlistat · yes · phentermine/topiramate · yes · naltrexone/bupropion · yes · semaglutide · nothing · tirzepatide · nothing · Eight trials, about 13,000 people with hypertension.

**Research, not medical advice.** This GLP is independent and educational. Nothing here is a substitute for individualized care from a licensed clinician, and reading it creates no doctor–patient relationship. Talk to your own provider before starting, stopping, or changing any medication, peptide, or therapy. See our [methodology](https://thisglp.com/methodology) and [terms](https://thisglp.com/terms).

## Key takeaways

-   A Cochrane review, now in its fourth update, pooled eight randomized trials of long-term weight drugs in adults with hypertension — roughly 13,000 participants.
-   The semaglutide trial (274 participants) and the tirzepatide trial reported no results at all for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, serious adverse events or adverse events.
-   Among the older drugs, orlistat probably increases serious adverse events (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.91, moderate certainty).
-   Liraglutide could not be included because no trial reported separate data for participants with hypertension.

Hypertension and obesity travel together, so the people most likely to be prescribed a weight drug are disproportionately the people this review is about. After four updates and eight trials, its conclusion is that the evidence remains insufficient to say whether these drugs reduce death or cardiovascular events in that group [\[1\]](https://thisglp.com/research/eight-trials-and-nobody-counted-the-deaths#ref-1).

The reason is not that the trials found nothing. It is that the two newest trials measured nothing the review needed. For both semaglutide and tirzepatide, the review records that no results were reported for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, serious adverse events or adverse events. Liraglutide could not be entered at all, because no trial has published separate figures for hypertensive participants — a gap of exactly the kind this site described in [who actually gets into trials](https://thisglp.com/research/are-glp1-drugs-safe-for-older-adults).

This is an absence of evidence, not evidence of harm

Nothing here says semaglutide or tirzepatide is dangerous in hypertension. It says the trials did not report the outcomes a reviewer would need to answer the question, in a population where the question is unusually live. Those are different claims and they get confused constantly — the distinction this site drew in [why preventing something is not treating it](https://thisglp.com/research/preventing-it-is-not-treating-it).

The older drugs did report, and the reporting is mixed. Orlistat probably increases serious adverse events against placebo, at a risk ratio of 1.45 with a confidence interval from 1.10 to 1.91 across three trials and 1,476 participants, rated moderate certainty. Naltrexone with bupropion probably increases all adverse events at RR 1.69 (95% CI 1.58 to 1.80) in a single trial of 8,283 people, while showing no difference in serious ones. Phentermine with topiramate probably increases all adverse events at RR 1.13 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.20) — the tolerability ordering this site set out in [the network meta-analysis of nineteen drugs](https://thisglp.com/research/the-best-losers-are-the-worst-tolerated).

Two facts about the evidence base frame the rest. Seven of the eight trials were funded by the pharmaceutical industry, which is ordinary and worth knowing. And the review itself had no dedicated funding, which is why its authors can end on a request rather than a conclusion: that completed trials enrolling both hypertensive and normotensive participants publish the hypertensive results separately.

For a reader with high blood pressure weighing one of these drugs, the practical position is that the weight and blood-pressure numbers exist while the hard-outcome numbers do not, in this population. That is a narrower gap than it sounds, because the cardiovascular outcome trials in broader populations are real and this site has covered them — including [the surgery comparison on cardiovascular outcomes](https://thisglp.com/research/bariatric-surgery-vs-glp1-cardiovascular). It is still a gap, and it is four updates old.

## Frequently asked

Does this review say GLP-1 drugs are unsafe in hypertension?

No. It says the semaglutide and tirzepatide trials reported no results for mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, serious adverse events or adverse events, so the question cannot be answered from them.

What did the older weight drugs show?

Orlistat probably increases serious adverse events (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.91). Naltrexone-bupropion and phentermine-topiramate probably increase all adverse events, at RR 1.69 and RR 1.13.

Why was liraglutide left out entirely?

Because no randomized trial has published separate results for participants with hypertension, so the review had nothing to pool.

## Sources

1.  \[1\] Spary-Kainz U, Posch N, Radl-Karimi C, Jeitler K, Krenn C, Siebenhofer A (2026). Long-term effects of weight-reducing drugs in people with hypertension Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. [PMID 42318855](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42318855/)

## Where to get it

### Best GLP-1 injections

Every injectable seller we can verify, with the price each one publishes and an honest read of what the trials measured.

[Compare providers →](https://thisglp.com/best/compounded-semaglutide)

## More in Evidence

-   [
    
    150 minutes · Weekly activity goal · 2 days · Muscle strengthening · Adapt · Symptoms and ability
    
    ### Exercise on Ozempic: Building Strength Without Ignoring Symptoms
    
    ](https://thisglp.com/research/exercise-on-ozempic)
-   [
    
    STEP 1, semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo, % change at 68 weeks · LDL cholesterol · −2.5% vs +1.3% · Total cholesterol · −3.3% vs +0.1% · HDL cholesterol · +5.2% vs +1.4% · Triglycerides · −21.9% vs −7.3% · Wegovy label, Table 13. Adults without diabetes. Ozempic doses are lower.
    
    ### Does Ozempic Lower Cholesterol? What the Lipid Results in the Trials Show
    
    ](https://thisglp.com/research/does-ozempic-lower-cholesterol)
-   [
    
    Where the insulin reduction came from, units per day · week 4 · 13.4 total · week 26 · 21.9 · the drug itself · the weight loss · The drug’s own contribution barely moved: 11.1 then 11.4. · Everything added between weeks 4 and 26 came from weight.
    
    ### Does Semaglutide Help Type 1 Diabetes? What Two Small Trials Found
    
    ](https://thisglp.com/research/semaglutide-in-type-1-diabetes)
