Three writers. One standard.
Three beats, split the way the decisions actually split — evidence reviewer, outcomes writer and standards editor. Each writer owns one of them, and the same name always covers the same ground.
We attach no degrees, no institutional affiliations and no clinical credentials to our writers, because we do not have any to attach and inventing them is the oldest trick in this category. What is real is the sourcing: every figure, dose and claim traces to the trial, the label or the paper of record, checked against the database before it published. Judge the citations.
Beats are stable on purpose, so if you disagree with how this site ranks a provider, you know exactly whose reasoning to argue with.
Dana Sullivan
Evidence reviewerWhat the trials measured, in whom, at what dose, and for how long.
View profile →Ruth Alvarez
Outcomes writerWhat the months actually look like — the plateau, the side effects, stopping.
View profile →Glenn Torres
Standards editorThe ranking rules, the corrections log, and what this site will not publish.
View profile →How we research and where we draw the line is set out in our methodology and editorial policy.