Skip to content
This GLP
← Research
Evidence

Does Taking a GLP-1 Before Pregnancy Raise Preeclampsia Risk? The Studies Split

Pooled, three cohorts showed no association. A JAMA cohort found 46% against 36% when the drug was stopped around conception, and a records study found 19.9% against 22.8%.

Glenn Torres7 min read
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, exposed vs unexposedStopped around conception46%36%Prescribed in prior 2 years19.9%22.8%Upper bar: exposed. Lower bar: unexposed.Pooled across three cohorts: OR 0.91 (0.57 to 1.47).

The studies point both ways. A pooled review of three cohorts found an odds ratio of 0.91 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.47) [1]. That is no significant association. A JAMA cohort then found hypertensive disorders in 46% of exposed pregnancies against 36% [2]. In that cohort the drug was stopped before or early in pregnancy. A larger records study found the opposite: 19.9% against 22.8% [3].

Preeclampsia is one of several hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Most studies below count them together. Birth defects and other pregnancy outcomes are a separate question, covered in the pregnancy evidence guide.

1. The pooled review

The review searched five databases to December 2025 [1]. It found three retrospective cohorts, all from the United States. Together they held 10,880 pregnancies: 4,942 exposed and 5,938 unexposed. Exposure meant a GLP-1 before conception or in the first trimester.

Two of the three found lower risk. One found higher. Pooled, the odds ratio was 0.91. The interval runs from a 43% reduction to a 47% increase. The review rules out neither.

2. When the drug was stopped around conception

The JAMA cohort drew on 149,790 pregnancies in one academic health system [2]. Exposure meant a GLP-1 order from three years before conception to 90 days after it. It matched 448 exposed pregnancies to 1,344 unexposed. 84% of the exposed group had obesity.

Hypertensive disorders reached 46% against 36%, a risk ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.49). Weight gain in pregnancy was 13.7 kg against 10.5 kg. Preterm delivery and gestational diabetes were also higher. The authors frame the result as following discontinuation of the drug.

3. When the drug was prescribed in the two prior years

A national records study matched 4,267 pregnancies with a GLP-1 prescription in the prior 24 months against 4,267 with none [3]. Hypertensive disorders ran at 19.9% against 22.8%, an odds ratio of 0.84 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.94). Gestational diabetes and preterm delivery were also lower.

This contrast is different. It compares ever being prescribed with never. It does not separate women who stopped early from women who stopped late.

4. A small cohort pointing up

A fourth cohort studied women with both obesity and diabetes [4]. It found 31 exposed pregnancies and matched 29. Preeclampsia was more common after exposure in the 12 or 24 months before delivery. The abstract reports p-values of 0.023 and 0.018, not rates. Cesarean delivery was also more frequent. With 29 matched pairs, the estimate is fragile.

How the four fit together

The pooled review does not name its three cohorts in the abstract. Some of the studies above may be among them. So the four results cannot be added up.

One reading fits most of the data. Taking the drug before pregnancy may lower risk. Stopping it close to conception may raise risk as weight and blood pressure return. That reading is not proven. No study tested it directly.

What to do with this

The rule is short. GLP-1 drugs are contraindicated in pregnancy [2]. Anyone who could become pregnant on one should raise it with a prescriber before starting. When to stop before trying to conceive is that prescriber's call. Effects on conception itself are covered in the fertility guide, and the period after birth in the breastfeeding guide.

Blood pressure is checked at prenatal visits. Tell the obstetric team about any GLP-1 taken in the prior three years.

Frequently asked

Does taking a GLP-1 before pregnancy raise preeclampsia risk?
The studies disagree. A pooled review of three cohorts found an odds ratio of 0.91 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.47). A JAMA cohort found hypertensive disorders in 46% against 36% when the drug was stopped around conception. A records study found 19.9% against 22.8% after a prescription in the prior two years.
Does stopping a GLP-1 before pregnancy raise blood pressure risk?
In the JAMA cohort, pregnancies where the drug was stopped before or early in pregnancy had more hypertensive disorders, a risk ratio of 1.29, and 3.3 kg more weight gain. The study did not test continuing the drug, which is not recommended in pregnancy.
Can a GLP-1 prevent preeclampsia?
That has not been shown. One records study found lower rates after a prescription in the prior two years, 19.9% against 22.8%. Other cohorts found higher rates, and none of these studies was a trial.
Should I tell my obstetrician I took a GLP-1?
Yes. The JAMA cohort counted any order in the three years before conception. Blood pressure monitoring is part of prenatal care, and the team needs the history.

Sources

  1. [1] Pisani D, Lorenza D, Fordellone M, Cerillo A, Fatigati M, Hanulíková P, et al. (2026). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and GLP-1 receptor agonist timing: a systematic review and meta-analysis Endocrine. PMID 42536323
  2. [2] Maya J, Pant D, Fu Y, James K, Batlle C, Hsu S, et al. (2025). Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes After GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Discontinuation JAMA. PMID 41284263
  3. [3] Imbroane MR, LeMoine F, Nau CT (2025). Preconception glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use associated with decreased risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. PMID 39848396
  4. [4] Lemas DJ, Zapata R, Loy I, Mahadevan A, Wen T, Mkuu R, et al. (2026). Prepregnancy GLP-1RA Exposure and Risk of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Women With Obesity and Diabetes Obesity. PMID 42120704

More in Evidence